Sunday, April 7, 2013

TANZANIA - MALAWI BOARDER DISPUTS



     By The Citizen Reporters

Dar es Salaam/Lilongwe. Malawi says it is still banking on the SADC Forum of Former Heads of State and Government to resolve its border dispute with Tanzania.

In an apparent softening of Malawian President Joyce Banda’s earlier hard line stance, the country’s Foreign Affairs minister, Mr Ephraim Chiume, said Malawi had not yet pulled out of mediation led by the forum’s chairman, former Mozambican President Joaquim Chissano.

Mr Chiume said in a press statement released in Lilongwe on Saturday that Malawi was committed to finding an amicable and lasting solution to the lake boundary dispute with Tanzania, through peaceful dialogue and diplomatic efforts.

“This is why Malawi gladly resorted to the mediation on the matter by the Forum of Former African Heads of State and Government, which is being chaired by His Excellency Joaquim Chissano, former President of the Republic of Mozambique,” he said.

The statement was issued a day after Tanzanian Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation minister Bernard Membe urged Malawi to continue with the mediation process.

Mr Membe told reporters on Friday that Malawi should revisit what was agreed at the Dar es Salaam meeting, in which the southern African country was represented by Mr Chiume. It was agreed that both countries should stick to the SADC mediation.

Mr Membe said the Sadc forum also confirmed to Tanzania last week that it was continuing with mediation.

“We have received the letter from Mr Chissano stressing the forum’s commitment to resolving the Lake Nyasa border dispute. We are happy that they have remained firm and honoured what Malawi and Tanzania agreed on during the November meeting in Dar es Salaam.”

In the letter, Mr Chissano says he has consulted with a number of high-profile legal experts and those with vast experience in border disputes within the continent.

Mr Chiume said a point of contention in the mediation was the Tanzanian national accused by President Banda of leaking information from the Malawian dossier on the dispute to Tanzania.

“It was the view of the Malawi government that the Executive Secretary’s participation may compromise the mediation process, and that the playing field may not be level,” the Malawian minister said in his statement.

The statement was issued a few days after President Banda told a press conference on her return from the US that the country would proceed to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and dismissed the Sadc intervention as a “a waste of time.”

“Our earlier position was to go to the ICJ over this matter, but we did not want to be seen to be underrating the forum of former SADC leaders as our friends (Tanzania) had proposed to engage them,” she said. “We’re still waiting for them to make a determination. But if I have to tell Malawians the truth – it is a waste of time. It is better to go to the ICJ as we will be happy to respect the ruling of the court.”

But Saturday’s statement made no reference to the ICJ.

Malawi and Tanzania are at loggerheads over the ownership of Lake Nyasa, which is known in Malawi as Lake Malawi.

While Malawi claims its border is on the eastern shore of the lake, according to the 1890 Heligoland agreement, Tanzania says the border must be in the middle of the lake in accordance with international laws.

Negotiations over the dispute were initiated last year.

The first round of talks were held in the Malawian border town of Mzuzu in August but collapsed in September after Malawi said it was aggrieved by, according to President Banda, “Tanzania’s aggressive bahaviour.” This was after Tanzania published a new map, which, among other features, showed the boundary between Tanzania and Malawi as being in the middle of Lake Nyasa.





Tanzania offered an explanation by saying the new map was published to show a change in internal boundaries following the creation of new regions and districts. Dar es Salaam officials reminded their Malawi counterparts that Tanzanian maps have always showed that the common border runs at the middle of the lake.

But Malawi also claimed Tanzania’s security and defence forces were harassing fishermen in the lake. Lilongwe officials said negotiations would continue only after Dar es Salaam clarified on the new map and harassment issues. Last week, Lilongwe said Dar es Salaam had offered an explanation, but more clarification would be sought during the latest talks.

Talks resumed in November in Dar es Salaam but collapsed yet again and the two countries agreed to find a third party to mediate the dispute. They proceeded to the Sadc Forum.

Prospects of finding oil in the lake have intensified the wrangle after Malawi awarded a license to British firm Surestream to explore for oil in the north-eastern waters last year.


Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Brief Introduction to REPOA

 

 

Brief Introduction to REPOA

REPOA began operating in early 1995 and is now one of the leading independent research institutions in Tanzania specialising in policy research on socio-economic and development issues.
REPOA’s research is currently conducted in Mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar, with some research projects covering every district.
REPOA’s STRATEGIC PLAN FOR 2010-2014
Our Vision
To be a leading research institution in the production of knowledge to address development challenges.
Our Mission
To facilitate and undertake research, training and outreach.
Our Strategies for 2010-2014
Based on the stated mission and objectives, REPOA’s strategies are outlined as follows:
- Strategy I Develop Research Capacity
- Strategy II Facilitate and Undertake Strategic Research
- Strategy III Facilitate and Stimulate the Utilisation of Research Findings
- Strategy IV Enhance REPOA’S Capacity to Implement the Strategic Plan
REPOA’s Research Agenda is concerned with pro-poor growth and poverty reduction.
Research themes include:
- Growth and Development
- Governance
- Social Protection
Gender, Environment and Technology are cross-cutting in all the three themes.
Funding
Our primary sources of funding are from the governments of the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom and Tanzania. REPOA also receives funding from the Think Tank Initiative that is administered by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) of Canada, and from collaborative and/or commissioned work from local and international organisations.
REPOA’s Annual Plan for 2012
Please click here to access a summary of the 2012 Annual Plan and Budget.
Attachment: attachmentREPOA_Strategic_Plan_2010_-_2014-July_17-09_(14)

    Monday, April 1, 2013

    Public Expenditure Reviews of TANZANIA

     
    2013 ISSUE 1

     
    March 2013

    Public Expenditure Reviews of TANZANIA

    Tanzania¡¦s Public Expenditure Review (PER) process provides a forum where working groups comprising of representatives from the Government, development partners, academia, the private sector and civil society organizations agree on an analytical agenda, guide and finance its implementation and review all outputs. The overall objective is to improve fiscal policy formulation and management.
    The Government and development partners agreed in 2012 to revitalize the PER process. As a result, a champions group has been established with the responsibility to define and approve an analytical work program of the ¡§new¡¨ PER process as well as ensure its dissemination to key policy makers as part of the budget cycle. A small Secretariat has also been put in place to support the implementation process.
    This newsletter series provides a quarterly update on the public expenditure review process to ensure key stakeholders are kept informed and can effectively use the analysis generated from the public expenditure reviews to inform their decisions.
    Overleaf, there is a brief summary of each of the studies planned for 2013. Once first drafts of the studies are available, key stakeholders will be invited to comment. If you have a particular interest in any of the studies, please contact the PER Secretariat (contact details below) to ensure that you are invited to stakeholder meetings. Please identify which of the studies are of particular interest.
    Summary
    PER Secretariat


    Champions Group Meeting April 2013
    Annual PER Consultative Meeting TBC
    Upcoming Events
    The PER Secretariat is headed by the Deputy Permanent Secretary (Ministry of Finance) and consists of 4 staff from the Government and representatives of Development Partners:
    „h Paul Sulley (Ministry of Finance) sulleyp@yahoo.co.uk , psulley@mof.go.tz, Tel. 2122844
    „h Alice Matembele (Ministry of Finance) allicemm@yahoo.com, amatembele@mof.go.tz, Tel. 2137792
    „h Emmanuel Mungunasi (World Bank) emungunasi@worldbank.org , Tel. 2163232
    „h Victoria Cunningham (World Bank) vcunningham1@worldbank.org, Tel. 2163712
    Please do not hesitate to contact the PER Secretariat if you have any questions or comments .
    Public Expenditure Reviews
    2013 ISSUE 1.


    PER Champions
    The Champions’ Group under the chairmanship of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, was created with the mandate of approving the analytical agenda, delivering key messages from analytical outputs and evaluating the process. Other members include the Governor of the Bank of Tanzania, Executive Secretary of the Planning Commission, Permanent Secretary of the Prime Minister’s Office, World Bank Country Director, the GBS Chair (currently Head of DFID), EC Ambassador, UN Resident Representative, and the CEO of COSTEC as representative of research organizations in the country.


    PER Secretariat
    Champions Group Meeting April 2013
    Annual PER Consultative Meeting TBC
    Upcoming Events
    The PER Secretariat is headed by the Deputy Permanent Secretary (Ministry of Finance) and consists of 4 staff from the Government and representatives of Development Partners:
    „h Paul Sulley (Ministry of Finance) sulleyp@yahoo.co.uk , psulley@mof.go.tz, Tel. 2122844
    „h Alice Matembele (Ministry of Finance) allicemm@yahoo.com, amatembele@mof.go.tz, Tel. 2137792
    „h Emmanuel Mungunasi (World Bank) emungunasi@worldbank.org , Tel. 2163232
    „h Victoria Cunningham (World Bank) vcunningham1@worldbank.org, Tel. 2163712
    Please do not hesitate to contact the PER Secretariat if you have any questions or comments .
    Public Expenditure Reviews
    2013 ISSUE 1
    March 2013
    PER Champions
    The Champions¡¦ Group under the chairmanship of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, was created with the mandate of approving the analytical agenda, delivering key messages from analytical outputs and evaluating the process. Other members include the Governor of the Bank of Tanzania, Executive Secretary of the Planning Commission, Permanent Secretary of the Prime Minister¡¦s Office, World Bank Country Director, the GBS Chair (currently Head of DFID), EC Ambassador, UN Resident Representative, and the CEO of COSTEC as representative of research organizations in the country.
    PAGE 2 PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEWS
    This study will provide a comprehensive cost-benefit assessment of the overall tax exemptions provided in Tanzania and take stock of the effectiveness and efficiency of the exemptions implemented over the last decade. The main objective of the study is to inform the policy and decision makers in the Government on the costs and benefits of tax exemptions in Tanzania. The study will also point to international best practice, which can be adopted to minimize unnecessary losses of revenue as a result of the application of tax exemptions and propose reforms to increase tax revenue.
    The consultant has been procured and the study will be ready by June 2013.
    Managing Tax Exemptions in Tanzania
    The overall objective of this study is to assess the performance of the agricultural inputs support program (NAIVS) and determine the best options and systems for future implementation. The review will assess how the program has contributed to increased production, productivity and profitability of the Tanzanian farming/agriculture, the sustainability of these investments and the options for scaling up the program to cover a much larger farming population in the country.
    The assessment of the NAIVS subsidy program is currently underway (undertaken by REPOA) and the TOR for the wider Agricultural study has been finalized, the study is expected to start in March.
    Agricultural Subsidies
    Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS)
    The overall aim of the PETS is to provide detailed evidence of PFM challenges in LGAs to inform ongoing reforms at local and central government level, and ultimately contribute to improving the quality and impact of expenditure programs. In broad terms, it is expected that the PETS will examine the effectiveness of implementation of results by selected funds in 2010/11; and provide a diagnostic of challenges that impact on the efficient and timely flow of funds.
    A scoping exercise has been completed to outline previous PETS work and identify options for this study. The exercise will inform the future survey design and scope. The terms of reference are currently being drafted.
    Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)
    Public expenditure is critical to the success of PPPs, including early funding for preparation of transactions but also capital investment into transactions to ensure the financial, social and environmental viability of such functions. Public investment management is fundamental to the decision to finance investments either through PPP or purely public sources. This study will seek to determine how public funds can be best used to support PPPs, identifying where and how Government could use its scarce resources most efficiently to leverage private investment. In order to provide a worked example and improve impact, the ToRs will focus on the transport and power sectors. It should be noted that this does not imply any prioritization of these sectors by the Government; PPP will be relevant for all of the sectors indicated in the PPP Act. The terms of reference have been finalized and there will shortly be a tendering process undertaken by the PMO.
    Public Investment Management (PIM)
    This study will develop the Public Investment Management Operational Manual to guide government officials who prepare and develop projects/program proposals for financing at the central and local government levels. The manual will serve as a capacity strengthening tool and reference for government officials on standard procedures and methods for project appraisal. The terms of reference have been finalized and there will shortly be a tendering process undertaken by the POPC.
    Summary of PER 2013 Studies.

    Saturday, March 30, 2013

    RAILA ODINGA AKUBALI KUSHINDWA, AWATAKA WAKENYA KUDUMISHA AMANI


    MGOMBEA wa Urais nchini Kenya kwa tiketi ya muungano wa Chama cha CORD Raila Amolo Odinga amekubali kushindwa katika kesi ya kupinga matokeo aliyofungua katika Mahakama ya Juu nchini humo.

    Akihutubia taifa hilo muda mfupi uliopita,Odinga amesema kwamba anakubalina na hukumu hiyo iliyosomwa na Rais wa Mahakama hiyo Jaji Mkuu Willy Mutunga.

    "Nimekubalina na matokeo hayo kwa sababu yakuheshimu Katiba ya Kenya ambayo inasema matokeo ya urais yapingwe katika Mahakama hiyo na maamuzi yatakayotolewa na Mahakama ndiyo ya mwisho"alisema Odiga.

    Alisema, "Nilikwenda mahakamani kwa maslahi ya wakenya, hivyo natangaza rasmi kukubaliana na matokeo yaliyotangazwa na kuitakia amani serikali iliyoko madarakani,nitashikiana nao katika kujenga nchi yetu".

    Odinga ametoa kauli hiyo ikiwa ni muda mfupi baada ya Rais wa Mahakama hiyo Jaji Mkuu Willy Mutunga kutoa hukumu ya kesi hiyo na kusema kwamba mahakama imekubali kwa kauli moja kuwa uchaguzi ulifanywa kwa huru na uwazi na kumfanya  Kenyatta na mgombea mwenza wake William Ruto kuchaguliwa kihalali.

    THE HISTORY OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN TANZANIA


                                                 During Colonial Era


    During colonial days, totalitarian rule continued. Indigenous productive activities were suffocated by colonial regulations and competition from imports. Throughout the colonial period, a consistent policy was adopted to keep the colony as a producer of raw material for use in industries in Europe, and, consequently, dependent on manufactured goods from colonial masters. There was also a deliberate policy to limit participation of indigenous Africans, and to a lesser extent, Asians, in business activities. Thus, manufacturing, importing and exporting, banking and insurance were mainly done by Caucasians. Asians, most of who had been brought in to work as clerks during railway construction projects in the early 1960s, were encouraged to operate as sub-wholesalers and retailers. Arabs operated mainly as retailers.

    Africans participation in business was restricted to very small firms, such as dukawalas (tiny shops). Except for a few offspring of chiefs, the few Africans who went to colonial schools received only elementary education to enable them to understand clerical and other very low duties in the public and private sector. Therefore, at independence, the indigenous population was just as marginalized in their own country as the economy was in the international market. For example, in 1961, about 34,581 Africans and 7,500 Asians held retail trading licenses, but Asians handled well over two-thirds of the trade volume (Rweyemamu, 1979).

    Economic and social marginalization of Africans was part of a deliberate colonial policy of disempowering the indigenous population and hence making it easy to rule. Africans were made to believe that they were “naturally” inferior to other races and everything African was backward. Naturally, this environment had a negative effect on development of entrepreneurial values and competencies, including self-esteem, a belief in the ability to make things happen, confidence, initiative, aggressiveness, etc.

    However, the social and economic context created in various parts of the country presented different opportunities for the development of entrepreneurship. For example, European missionaries and farmers settled in some mountains areas of the country (Kilimanjaro, Tukuyu, Bukoba, Songea etc), where they introduced Christianity, education and commercial agriculture. They also encouraged the local population to cultivate commercial crops and to establish cooperatives. This development not only inspired the local population and exposed to new desires and opportunities, but it also led to land shortages which forced them to think and act in non-traditional ways in pursuing of livelihoods and “success.” Logically, the meaning of “success” to an offspring of a peasant farmer labouring every year for family subsistence will be vastly different from another who has experienced commercial farming, is aware of the possibilities and benefits of formal education and at the same time is aware that he will not have enough land even for his family’s subsistence as he grows up.